• HOME
  • RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT
  • RISK ASSESSMENT
  • CONSULTING SERVICES
  • More
    • HOME
    • RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT
    • RISK ASSESSMENT
    • CONSULTING SERVICES
  • HOME
  • RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT
  • RISK ASSESSMENT
  • CONSULTING SERVICES

Safety Risk & Compliance Assessment

A structured review of written safety and risk programs combined with on-site verification of how those controls are being applied in the real operation. 


This assessment evaluates both the written side of operational risk control and the reality on the floor. Many organizations have programs, procedures, and records in place, but the real question is whether the system still holds under day-to-day pressure. We review the documentation, inspect the operation, and look for the gaps between expectation and execution. 


Typical review areas include energy control, electrical safety, confined space, hot work, machine guarding, contractor controls, fall exposure, permitting practices, training records, labeling, signage, and other high-consequence activities. The scope is adjusted to the actual risk profile of the facility rather than forcing a generic checklist onto every plant. 


A plant does not need a recent incident to have serious exposure. In many operations, the real problem is drift. The written standard says one thing. Daily practice says another. Over time that gap becomes a source of injury risk, regulatory exposure, poor decisions, and preventable operational loss. This assessment helps leadership see that clearly before the event forces the issue. 

    

Clients receive a written assessment that identifies gaps, risk drivers, and practical improvement opportunities. Findings are organized so leaders can understand what needs immediate attention, what requires system work, and where stronger execution would reduce exposure most effectively.


This is not a certification service, legal opinion, or engineering signoff. Forbast advises on how to improve. Where templates or example tools are useful, we can provide them, but final requirements and legal interpretations still need to be validated by the client and any appropriate qualified parties 


If you suspect the plant has grown beyond the strength of its current systems, or if programs look better on paper than they do in practice, this is the place to start.


Schedule a call or meeting today 

Take a look at what a Risk finding sample looks like

Sample Risk Assessment Findings

Return on investment

Risk assessment pays because it reduces multiple forms of loss at once. OSHA states that effective safety and health systems commonly reduce injury and illness costs by 20% to 40%, and OSHA-cited research found a 9.4% reduction in injury claims and 26% average workers’ compensation savings after inspection. The cost of inaction is real: the National Safety Council puts the average medically consulted workplace injury at $48,000, while OSHA recorded 9,034 severe injuries in 2024, including 1,865 hospitalizations and 1,348 amputations in manufacturing alone. NFPA also reports $1.5 billion in annual direct property damage from fires at industrial and manufacturing properties. When a risk assessment identifies gaps tied to OSHA, NFPA 70E, and NFPA 70B before they become incidents, the return is not just compliance. It is fewer injuries, less downtime, lower loss exposure, and better control of where capital and corrective effort should go next. 

Executive letter for CEOs and CFOs outlining the financial, operational, and exposure-related case for a risk assessment. 

CEO/CFO Letter

Frequently Asked Questions

A risk assessment is a structured audit of workplace conditions, systems, practices, and exposures that could lead to injury, regulatory issues, property damage, production disruption, or preventable financial loss.


Risk auditing helps organizations identify vulnerabilities before they turn into incidents. It supports safer operations, stronger compliance, better decision making, and lower exposure to unplanned cost and disruption.


A lack of recent incidents does not always mean risk is well controlled. Many serious events develop from gaps that go unnoticed until something goes wrong, and a risk audit helps uncover those weaknesses early.


A risk assessment can identify hazards, control weaknesses, program gaps, documentation issues, training deficiencies, inconsistent practices, and exposure areas that may increase operational, safety, or compliance risk.


By identifying significant exposures and weak controls, the audit helps leadership prioritize corrective actions that can reduce incidents, downtime, claims, regulatory problems, and other avoidable business losses.


A risk assessment can improve safety performance, strengthen compliance readiness, support insurance discussions, protect operational continuity, and give management clearer visibility into where risk reduction efforts will create the most value.


No. Any operation can benefit from understanding where its vulnerabilities exist. Even well-run facilities often have blind spots, informal practices, or aging controls that deserve closer review.


An outside firm brings objectivity, consistency, and a fresh perspective that internal teams may not be able to maintain while managing daily operations. That outside view often helps surface issues that have become normalized over time.



Copyright © 2024 Forbast Group - All Rights Reserved.


Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept